REJECTED PUBLICTY PHOTO CATHERINE SUBMITTED FOR DOUBLE FANTASY:

Tags: , , , , , ,

26 Responses to “REJECTED PUBLICTY PHOTO CATHERINE SUBMITTED FOR DOUBLE FANTASY:”

  1. Fred says:

    Get it off…

  2. BLJ says:

    Oh, my Goodness! Where did you find this one?

  3. Lizzie says:

    Gorgeous as always!

  4. Kevin says:

    Can you imagine how Brian Epstein would have reacted to this photo……

  5. Since 1963 says:

    I’m not sure he would even react. I understand Brian liked the rough and tumble dock-worker kind of men.

  6. Jennifer says:

    Cute! lol : )

  7. Chris says:

    WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!

  8. Another_Fan says:

    Haha nicely done! XD

  9. Steve says:

    blasphemy

  10. maxeythecat says:

    Um…..I don’t think so……now I have to go give my eyes a bleaching….

  11. Don Vito says:

    (ahem) OK, to be fair you now have to do Yoko as a man.

  12. Kwai Chang says:

    A new low!

  13. Kevin says:

    Since 1963;
    Guess you never heard the story of where and who John was with when Julian was born in 1963. And as a result, the famous fight John got into two months later at Paul’s 21st Birthday party.

  14. Tammy says:

    I try my hardest Kwai :-)

  15. Kwai Chang says:

    I know that. You are quite the diplomat. I think you actually please everyone with your efforts…that is unprecedented. Keep it up my friend. And remember, people disagreeing with my opinions don’t bother me in the least…as long as no harm comes to you over it. I love it here. Thanks, again.

  16. spyros says:

    YOU SHOULD REMOVE THIS AWFUL PHOTO!!!!IT’S A BLASPHEMY FOR JOHN LENNON!!I CAN’T BELIEVE THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE IN THIS BLOG THAT LIKE IT!!!!!!!!!SHAME ON THEM!!!!!

  17. Aeolian Cadence says:

    Kevin, I’m pretty sure Since 1963 wasn’t suggesting Brian wouldn’t have been attracted to John (after all, it’s pretty well documented that he was), just that John in drag wouldn’t have done it for him.

  18. henry says:

    yes spyros john lennon was a “saint” sorry a “god”

  19. Markzapp says:

    It appears that the females are more tolerant of “The Beatles As Women” portraits here than the males are. As a male this is embarrassing(to put it mildy). It serves no good purpose. I really want to punch the joker that creates these. Maybe even light them on fire…

  20. BLJ says:

    When I see pictures like this it really does not bother me, but it is not about me, it’s about John. I would never photo shop this because I would be thinking about Julian, Yoko, and Sean. Would they find this flattering or insulting? Because I had to ask myself that question, I would never photo shop a picture like this of John or any of the other Beatles.

  21. Tammy says:

    What about the person who posts them? :-)

  22. BLJ says:

    Well, I can’t judge who posted it because I posted it to someone myself. The person who post it did not photo shop it. I guess that makes me just as bad as the person who photo shopped, I’m not perfect :D

  23. Kwai Chang says:

    Anything is better than censorship!

  24. spyros says:

    @Henry Did your last name is McCartney?

  25. Steve says:

    if its a way of getting comments on your blog, then its a bit of a cheap shot

  26. Tammy says:

    Steve, everyone know’s i’m above cheap and crass, everything i do is in the BEST Pahhhhhhsible taste.

Leave a Reply