Tags: 1964, Beatles, Miami, Ringo
This entry was posted
on Thursday, May 27th, 2010 at 4:32 pm and is filed under Beatle Photos.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Oh that’s got to be photo shopped! Wasn’t Ringo the only circumcised Beatle?
It’s his fag packet that’s all
Meanwhile, Paul is covering his family jewels… Mean Mr McCartney!
Heh, i like the cut of your jib Brian
The jury is still out on the cut/uncut debate with George and Ringo, we know John was uncut, we know Paul was circumcised .. it’s the technical details really.
Ooooo quite nice! (Bad Me) lol I sure wish we could get some pics like this of the others too (double bad me) LOL
If only they’d all followed John’s example and dropped their drawers for the camera – we wouldn’t be having this debate! Personally I doubt that Ringo and George were circumcised. It was extremely unusual for working class boys to be cut in the 1940s, and the only reason I can think of for Paul being circumcised is that his mother was a midwife and had picked up the idea from middle class doctors.
All I can say is —-Oh, baby….(Paul, why did you have to put your hands there????). Ha!!
i know how we know that john wasn’t.. dare i ask how we know that paul was??
Mike Mac mentioned it in his book.
wow, whatta blabbermouth
I don’t care if it is photoshopped!!
Yeah, Yeah, Yeah!
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Beatle Photo Blog is proudly powered by
WordPress, Installed by Installatron.
and Comments (RSS).